butterfly
campus greens

Home


Marin:
Issues
Next Election
Elected Greens



Notices

Press Releases:
Marin
State
National

10 Key Values

Volunteer

Donate

Register Green

By-laws

Agenda & Minutes

Links
About us:
County Council
Contact us

Local Issues


Great Green Victory
Community Choice okayed by Commission

In a last minute midnight compromise decision brought about by pressure from AB117 sponsor Carole Migden, SF Supervisor Tom Ammiano and Senate President Pro Tem John Burton, the California Public Utilities commission voted 5-0 to adopt an electric utility procurement framework that will leave room for community Choice Aggregation and renewable energy.


The decision approved a utility procurement framework phasing in utility contracts, limiting the amount of power the utilities buy and speed at which they buy it leaving space for San Francisco, Marin County and dozens of other California cities seeking to escape utility procurement to aggressively develop renewable resources and energy efficiency technologies.


Marin Greens, Sustainable Fairfax, Sustainable Mill Valley, Sustainable Novato and Hunters Point and San Francisco activists joining Ratepayers for Affordable Green Energy (RAGE) in asking the commissioners not to order utilities to overbuy power contracts that would make California dependent on foreign natural gas.


In December the CPUC was prepared to approve a five-year contract that would have locked in available power plant capacity and put ratepayers on the hook for 100% gas-fired capacity.
Commission Lynch, seconded by swing vote Commissioner Geoffrey Brown and Carl Wood, credited coalition members for educating the Commission on the negative impacts of their previous plan.

A RESOLUTION OF THE GREEN PARTY OF MARIN

OPPOSING THE NATURAL GAS PROCUREMENT PLAN


WHEREAS the purpose of the Green Party of Marin County Council is to further ecological wisdom and sustainability through political and social action; and

WHEREAS the Green Party of Marin represents almost 5000 voters who adhere to the beliefs stated above; and

WHEREAS the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) is considering a five-year utility procurement plan that ignores the Community Choice law and the Renewables Standards that allow local communities to invest in cleaner, more efficient sources of energy such as solar and wind power and to reduce their exposure to the volatile natural gas energy markets.

THEREFORE be it RESOLVED that the Green Party of Marin County Council urges CPU Commissioners to vote down this proposal and alter it so that local communities are not penalized for using non-polluting forms of energy, but are encouraged to use it.

Signed this 5th day of January, 2004 by

John Anastasio, Secretary
Green Party of Marin County Council

Sean Prendiville, Co-Coordinator
Green Party of Marin County Council

For more information contact: http://www.local.org/



For Your Information - At the costs projected by Alpine Power Co, the $87 billion spent on the war on Iraqi would
buy 192,904 windmills. The total resulting electricity production, again assuming each windmill can run one
third of the time, would come to more than 1,015 billion kilowatt-hours per year. This amounts to a little more
than a quarter of all U.S. electricity consumption in 2000.


Marin Greens are also concentrating on the following local issues:

  • Anti-desalination program - We will counter plans by the Marin Municipal Water District to set up a large-scale desalination plant at the western end of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. Using large amounts of energy to turn salt water into fresh water is contrary to the philosophy of sustainability - living with the resources we have naturally available.
  • Wetlands - We will call for a continuous band of wetlands along the Marin County shoreline that is protected and publically owned.
  • Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) - We will strive to get IRV ordinances passed in all municipalities so that citizens can rank their votes and vote their conscience. IRV allows you to rank as many, or as few, candidates as you wish: first choice, second choice, and so on. IRV also ensures all elected officials are elected by a majority vote. Two bills for IRV currently in review need your support. SCA 14 amends the California Constitution to allow IRV. AB 1039 allows IRV in muncipal elections. Vote your beliefs, not the lesser of your fears! Contact Assemblyman Joe Nation and Senator John Burton to urge them to support these bills. Passing these bills will be a huge victory for California voters!
  • Election support - We will organize to better support Greens running for local office.

Marin Council supports Health Care for all Californians Act

SAN RAFAEL - June 26 - The Green Party of Marin Council has come out in support of State Senator Shelia Kuehl's Senate Bill 921, the Helath Care for All Californians Act.

Council Coordinator Sean Prendiville said in a letter to Kuehl, "Over the last decade, it has become clear that our health care systemcannot be fixed using partial measures that do not address its structural problems. SB 921corrects the underlying problems of inefficiency, waste and partial coverage that continue to undermine California's health care system.

All Californians lose when hospitals close and emergency rooms are crowded with people who can not receive needed care in a doctor's office because they have no health insurance. All Californians  lose when billions of dollars are wasted on unnecessary administrative costs. All Californians and their employers lose when insurance premiums become unaffordable and benefits are reduced.

Our current health care system spends between 20-30% of all healthcare dollars on administrative costs. Under the single payer system proposed by SB 921, administrative costs are reduced to 5% of  the health care budget, saving $14 billion dollars that will be redirected into health care services for  all Californians.

California needs a health care system that works for everyone and treats everyone equally.

Californians need a system that provides them with security of knowing that they will never lose health insurance because they can't afford it, or because they  condition or  because they lose their jobs. SB 921 provides such a system. We strongly support it. "
 
 


The Heritage Tree Preservation Act

 

The Heritage Tree Preservation Act (SB 754), as introduced by Senator Perata, will ban the cutting of select species of old-growth trees (Coast Redwoods, Giant Sequoia, Port Orford Cedars, Douglas-firs and hardwoods) in California on non-federal forestlands that were alive in 1850, California's first year of statehood. SB 754 applies protections to the remaining oldest and largest trees, which represent less than one-half of one percent of the non-federally owned trees standing in California today. For more information on the bill, please go to: <http://www.ancienttrees.org>www.ancienttrees.org or call Lisa Beyer at 510-444-4710 ext. 308.

The bill has passed the California State Senate and now is in the Assembly where it is awaits a vote in the Committee on Natural Resources (June 30, 2003). If and when it passes there, it will be referred to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the Assembly Floor and then to the Governor's desk for a final signature. Please help us make it happen!


Marin Council urges passage of Corporate Three Strikes Bill  (SB335)

 SACRAMENTO - In an effort to protect Californians by curtailing "crime in the suites," the Green Party of California urges the passage of a bill on the senate floor aiming a "three strikes" law at corporate criminals.

Authored by Sen. Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles), the Corporate Three-Strikes Act (SB335) would make California the first state with a three strikes law for corporate crime. The bill, which passed in the Senate Judiciary Committee this month, now heads to the senate floor.

The bill is modeled on the "three strikes" law for persons, which jails felons for 25 years-to-life on their third felony, no matter how trivial. The GPCA opposes that law targeting people, because it serves as welfare for prison industries and as cruel and unusual punishment against non-violent offenders.

"If this is how California punishes people who commit felonies, it's certainly appropriate for the Enrons of the world," said Carmen Balber, a consumer activist at the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "California's $35 billion dollar deficit is largely due to the corporate misdeeds of energy companies, including Enron, during last year's energy crisis."

"This is landmark legislation," said Gabrielle Weeks, alternate regional representative to the Green Party of California. "After so many scandals left millions of pensioners with no retirement, it's good to see elected officials stand up for the people's welfare, and say "no"
to greedy corporations."

SB335 would ban corporations convicted of three or more felony crimes within a 10-year period from doing business in California. Upon conviction of a third-strike, the state can revoke the charter of a California corporation or revoke the state business certification for out-of-state businesses.

The bill covers corporations, nonprofit mutual benefit organizations, business partnerships and limited liability companies convicted of violating fraud, tax, bribery, extortion, consumer and environmental protection, civil rights, labor, employment, antitrust, political campaign or finance laws.

The bill would curb practices by corporations such as Santa Barbara-based Tenet Healthcare Corporation, now under investigation for charges of Medicare fraud, performing unnecessary medical procedures and gouging the uninsured. Tenet was previously convicted of Medicare fraud for committing patients to psychiatric hospitals unnecessarily and holding them against their will. Although the company changed its name and paid nearly $700 million in fines and reparations, its corporate behavior appears to be unchanged.

 

Greens for Kerry

Greens for Impact

What the GOP is doing with your Social Security money